Comrade Franz Lee
Your words continue being sharp shotsRoy S. Carson, Vheadline.com:
The African 'Star Wars'* - *It is the Pentagon's Africom versus China's web of investments - the ultimate prize: Africa's natural resources.*
By: Pepe Escobar
As Africa increasingly turns to China for economic investment and guidance,
Africom seeks to reverse China's geostrategic foothold on Africa
>From energy wars to water wars, the 21st century will be determined by a
fierce battle for the world's remaining natural resources. The chessboard is
global. The stakes are tremendous. Most battles will be invisible. All will be
crucial.
In resource-rich Africa, a complex subplot of the New Great Game in Eurasia is
already in effect. It's all about three major intertwined developments:
1) The coming of age of the African Union (AU) in the early 2000s.
2) China's investment offencive in Africa throughout the 2000s.
3) The onset of the Pentagon's African Command (Africom) in 2007.
Beijing clearly sees that the Anglo-French-American bombing of Libya – apart
from its myriad geopolitical implications – has risked billions of dollars in
Chinese investments, not to mention forcing the (smooth) evacuation of more than
35,000 Chinese working across the country.
And crucially, depending on the outcome – as in renegotiated energy contracts by
a pliable, pro-Western government – it may also seriously jeopardise Chinese oil
imports (3 per cent of total Chinese imports in 2010).
No wonder the China Military, a People's Liberation Army (PLA) newspaper, as
well as sectors in academia, are now openly arguing that China needs to drop
Deng Xiaoping's "low-profile" policy and bet on a sprawling armed forces to
defend its strategic interests worldwide (these assets already total over $1.2
trillion).
Now compare it with a close examination of Africom's strategy, which reveals as
the proverbial hidden agenda the energy angle and a determined push to isolate
China from northern Africa.
One report titled "China's New Security Strategy in Africa" actually betrays the
Pentagon's fear of the PLA eventually sending troops to Africa to protect
Chinese interests.
It won't happen in Libya. It's not about to happen in Sudan. But further on down
the road, all bets are off.
Meddle is our middle name
The Pentagon has in fact been meddling in Africa's affairs for more than half a
century. According to a 2010 US Congressional Research Service study, this
happened no less than 46 times before the current Libya civil war.
Among other exploits, the Pentagon invested in a botched large-scale invasion of
Somalia and backed the infamous, genocide-related Rwanda regime.
The Bill Clinton administration raised hell in Liberia, Gabon, Congo and Sierra
Leone, bombed Sudan, and sent "advisers" to Ethiopia to back dodgy clients
grabbing a piece of Somalia (by the way, Somalia has been at war for 20 years).
The September 2002 National Security Strategy (NSS), conceived by the Bush
administration, is explicit; Africa is a "strategic priority in fighting terrorism".
Yet, the never-say-die "war on terror" is a sideshow in the Pentagon's vast
militarisation agenda, which favours client regimes, setting up military bases,
and training of mercenaries – "cooperative partnerships" in Pentagon newspeak.
Africom has some sort of military "partnership" – bilateral agreements – with
most of Africa's 53 countries, not to mention fuzzy multilateral schemes such as
West African Standby Force and Africa Partnership Station.
American warships have dropped by virtually every African nation except for
those bordering the Mediterranean.
The exceptions: Ivory Coast, Sudan, Eritrea and Libya. Ivory Coast is now in the
bag. So is South Sudan. Libya may be next. The only ones left to be incorporated
to Africom will be Eritrea and Zimbabwe.
Africom's reputation has not been exactly sterling – as the Tunisian and
Egyptian chapters of the great 2011 Arab Revolt caught it totally by surprise.
These "partners", after all, were essential for surveillance of the southern
Mediterranean and the Red Sea.
Libya for its part presented juicy possibilities: an easily demonised dictator;
a pliable post-Gaddafi puppet regime; a crucial military base for Africom; loads
of excellent cheap oil; and the possibility of throwing China out of Libya.
Under the Obama administration, Africom thus started its first African war. In
the words of its commander, General Carter Ham, "we completed a complex,
short-notice, operational mission in Libya and… transferred that mission to NATO."
And that leads us to the next step. Africom will share all its African "assets"
with NATO. Africom and NATO are in fact one – the Pentagon is a many-headed
hydra after all.
Beijing for its part sees right through it; the Mediterranean as a NATO lake
(neocolonialism is back especially, via France and Britain); Africa militarised
by Africom; and Chinese interests at high risk.
The lure of ChinAfrica
One of the last crucial stages of globalisation - what we may call "ChinAfrica"
– established itself almost in silence and invisibility, at least for Western eyes.
In the past decade, Africa became China's new Far West. The epic tale of masses
of Chinese workers and entrepreneurs discovering big empty virgin spaces, and
wild mixed emotions from exoticism to rejection, racism to outright adventure,
grips anyone's imagination.
Individual Chinese have pierced the collective unconscious of Africa, they have
made Africans dream – while China the great power proved it could conjure
miracles far away from its shores.
For Africa, this "opposites attract" syndrome was a great boost after the 1960s
decolonisation – and the horrid mess that followed it.
China repaved roads and railroads, built dams in Congo, Sudan and Ethiopia,
equipped the whole of Africa with fibre optics, opened hospitals and orphanages,
and – just before Tahrir Square – was about to aid Egypt to relaunch its
civilian nuclear programme.
The white man in Africa has been, most of the time, arrogant and condescending.
The Chinese, humble, courageous, efficient and discreet.
China will soon become Africa's largest trading partner – ahead of France and
the UK – and its top source of foreign investment. It's telling that the best
the West could come up with to counteract this geopolitical earthquake was to go
the militarised way.
The external Chinese model of trade, aid and investment – not to mention the
internal Chinese model of large-scale, state-led investments in infrastructure –
made Africa forget about the West while boosting the strategic importance of
Africa in the global economy.
Why would an African government rely on the ideology-based "adjustments" of IMF
and the World Bank when China attaches no political conditions and respects
sovereignty – for Beijing, the most important principle of international law? On
top of it, China carries no colonial historical baggage in Africa.
Essentially, large swathes of Africa have rejected the West's trademark shock
therapy, and embraced China.
Western elites, predictably, were not amused. Beijing now clearly sees that in
the wider context of the New Great Game in Eurasia, the Pentagon has now
positioned itself to conduct a remixed Cold War with China all across Africa –
using every trick in the book from obscure "partnerships" to engineered chaos.
The leadership in Beijing is silently observing the waters. For the moment, the
Little Helmsman Deng's "crossing the river while feeling the stones" holds.
The Pentagon better wise up. The best Beijing may offer is to help Africa to
fulfil its destiny. In the eyes of Africans themselves, that certainly beats any
Tomahawk.
Pepe Escobar is the roving correspondent for Asia Times (www.atimes.com). His
latest book is Obama Does Globalistan (Nimble Books, 2009). He may be reached at
pepeasia@yahoo.com
The views expressed in this article are the author's own and do not necessarily
reflect Al Jazeera's editorial policy.
http://english.aljazeera.net/indepth/opinion/2011/04/2011422131911465794.html
--
http://english-juttaschmitt.blogspot.com
http://juttaschmitt.blogspot.com
HOME
As radioactive fallout skyrockets, NaturalNews advises readers to consider precautionary doses of iodine, bentonite clay and zeolites
Monday, April 25, 2011
by Mike Adams, the Health Ranger
Editor of NaturalNews.com (See all articles...)
(NaturalNews) Based on the accumulation of information from multiple sources, it
is now clear that the true scope of the Fukushima disaster has been greatly
downplayed by both the Japanese and U.S. governments. NaturalNews is now urging
its readers to begin taking regular, safe doses of three things: Natural iodine
sources (seaweed or otherwise), bentonite clay (for internal use) and zeolites
(any brand).
Naturally, be sure to check with a qualified nutritionist or natural medicine
practitioner when taking supplements. Those on thyroid medications, in
particular, should seek professional advice before consuming supplementary
iodine from any source.
Bentonite clay is, of course, completely safe for internal use (yes, you can eat
it) when used as directed. It is a cleansing substance that can bind with
various radioactive isotopes and carry them out of your body. Zeolites are also
extremely good at attracting both heavy metals and some radioactive isotopes
which are also carried out of your body.
Radiation emissions are far higher than official reports
The reason for this action notice is due to the increasing realization that
radiation emissions from Fukushima are far higher than what we are being told.
Although I have analyzed reports from multiple sources on this, perhaps the best
citizen blogger explaining this right now is found at
http://ex-skf.blogspot.com/2011/04/...
This blogger is Japanese, and he reads the local Japanese news sources to get a
lot of information about Fukushima before the translators screw it up (or
distort it).
His latest post reveals that Fukushima is releasing 154 terabequerels of
radiation per day. This is an order of magnitude higher than what the official
Japanese sources were saying just a few weeks ago.
Another great blogger on Fukushima is Lucas Whitefield Hixson, who published an
analysis of the photos that seems to indicate Reactor No. 3 already suffered a
massive core containment breach from the very first explosion:
http://lucaswhitefieldhixson.com/hi...
If true, this would mean that TEPCO has been lying to us from day one about the
true extend of the reactor core containment vessel breach.
Why world governments won't tell you the truth
I have good reason to believe we may very well be witnessing an event that has
already vastly exceeded the Chernobyl disaster in its total release of radiation
into the environment. Yet the admission of that fact is so politically unviable
that no government dare admit utter the words. Instead, it is much more
politically expedient to simply imagine there is no radiation (it's invisible,
after all), and hope no one notices the huge increases in cancer rates in the
coming years.
Such is the cowardice is modern-day political leaders. To avoid causing a panic,
they would rather people keep eating radioactive fish and drinking radioactive
milk. Somewhere in Washington, a group of nuclear experts must be sitting around
a table with the President, asking, "So when are we going to tell them about all
this?" The answer is, of course, "Never."
After all, any increase in cancer can always be blamed on sunbathing, or tanning
salons, or whatever convenient target the medical community is currently trying
to discredit. (Heck, they could probably find a way to say that vitamin D causes
cancer!)
This Fukushima fallout could even be a whole new profit center for the cancer
industry which has long been in the business of irradiation women's breasts with
mammography machines anyway. Cancer industry corporations must be drooling over
the profit prospects that will emerge from the global radiation exposure under
way right now.
Most people will take no precautions
The upshot of all this is that the masses may be suffering from very risky doses
of radioactive fallout right now, with no precautions whatsoever being taken to
protect themselves. After all, President Obama stood in front of his podium and
told the American people there was nothing to worry about. He said no one needed
to prepare, and this was followed up with yet more official urgings to avoiding
taking potassium iodide. (http://www.naturalnews.com/031735_O...)
The game is apparently on. What game is that? The game of culling the human
population by eliminating from the human gene pool those individuals who are too
brain dead to think for themselves. Cancer + infertility, after all, is a fairly
effective way to remove someone's genetic code from the future of the
population, and what better than a massive, global radiation dump to sort out
the brainwashed masses from those who actually take their genetic future seriously?
That's one theory behind all this, at least. Some say it's only a theory and
nothing more. But when you look at what's really happening today with the mass
intentional contamination and destruction of our planet -- the spread of GMOs,
the fluoride poisoning of the water supply, the pesticide-induced honey bee
population collapse, and so on -- you can't help but wonder if someone really is
trying to kill off a very large segment of the human population. Fukushima
either deliberately or coincidentally seems to play right into that agenda.
Or maybe that's all just paranoid conspiracy thinking, and the real explanation
behind all this is just global government incompetence combined with
pathological national leaders who have no compassion whatsoever for the lives
and health of their own citizens. Either explanation is sufficiently bizarre
enough to make intelligent people at least start asking questions... and
hopefully to start taking some precautions against radiation fallout (hence the
iodine, clay and zeolites). Bentonite clay, after all, doesn't cost much. Losing
the genetic integrity of your sperm production, on the other hand, is a real
show-stopper.
Then again, maybe all of this is just a bunch of hooey. If you believe the
"scientific" community, the government figures are always accurate. There's no
cover-up. The situation is completely under control. The radiation levels are
miniscule. There was no meltdown. Go on about your business and stop worrying.
Just eat your imported fish, go get your CT scans at the hospital and take your
antidepressants. Buy your slave-labor brand-name sports gear at the local mall,
and be sure to slather yourself in perfumes, petroleum-based skin lotions and
sunscreen (to protect yourself from cancer, of course).
And then, a few years down the road, if you find your DNA has mutated beyond
your ability to reproduce in the future, don't worry: You can always trade a
year's salary for some hormone injections at the local infertility clinic,
right? Infertility clinics, by the way, are really great at increasing the
survival rate of fetuses with birth defects which would otherwise normally be
aborted by the mother's own body (http://www.naturalnews.com/020905_i...).
*How Fukushima could create a real Spider Man!
*
So even if the next generation of children in America are born mostly to
irradiated, genetically-mutated parents, thanks to the "miracle" of modern
infertility science we can probably manage to keep a fair number of them alive
long enough for them to become the new generation of post-Fukushima X-Men with
special mutant powers that can save our world from evil villains. Fukushima
might also irradiate some spiders that could bite a few geeky teenage boys and
magically transform them into acrobatic "spider men" who magically attain
advanced hand-to-hand combat skills without ever having practiced them. What
could be bad about that?
In fact, the entire Marvel universe of comic book characters might yet
materialize out of the smoke and (radioactive) dust of Fukushima. So, you see,
Fukushima is actually the solution to all our problems, not the source of any
problems.
And if you think none of this could really happen because I'm quoting characters
from comic books, just remember this: The Japanese government is reading you
lines from a fairy tale and hoping you buy into it just the same.
Learn more: http://www.naturalnews.com/032179_Fukushima_zeolites.html#ixzz1Kb3laRUJ
http://www.naturalnews.com/032179_Fukushima_zeolites.html
--
http://english-juttaschmitt.blogspot.com
http://juttaschmitt.blogspot.com
home
(Video) Australian physician, author, and anti-nuclear advocate Helen Caldicott talks about the Fukushima nuclear catastrophe Comentario: Hola Alba, estimada amiga, gracias por intentar una respuesta en Aporrea. No importa que no te la hayan publicado. Lamentablemente, en algún momento hasta personas tan ciegas y dogmáticas como Brito van a tener que aterrizar en la realidad. Las pocas informaciones no censuradas que nos llegan sobre Japón son verdaderamente horribles. Si manejas un poquito de inglés, vaya a nuestro blog: http://franzjtlee.blogspot.com y lea la última entrada (la que aparece arriba en la página y vea también el video. Ahí habla una veterana activista contra la energía nuclear, Helen Caldicott, y nos da una idea de la espantosa magnitud de lo que pasa en Fukushima y sus nefastas consequencias para la vida en todo el planeta. Un abrazo y saludos cordiales, Franz J. T. Lee y Jutta Schmitt
(Video) Australian physician, author, and anti-nuclear advocate Helen Caldicott talks about the Fukushima nuclear catastrophe and what we can expect. It ain’t pretty.
LINK:
http://www.franzlee.org.ve/pandemonium01573.html
http://www.prisonplanet.com/helen-caldicott-talks-about-the-horror-of-fukushima.html
Helen Caldicott
Biography
The single most articulate and passionate advocate of citizen action to remedy
the nuclear and environmental crises, Dr Helen Caldicott, has devoted the last
38 years to an international campaign to educate the public about the medical
hazards of the nuclear age and the necessary changes in human behavior to stop
environmental destruction.
Born in Melbourne, Australia in 1938, Dr Caldicott received her medical degree
from the University of Adelaide Medical School
in 1961. She founded the Cystic Fibrosis
Clinic at the Adelaide Children's Hospital in 1975
and subsequently was an instructor in pediatrics at Harvard Medical School
and on the staff of the Children's Hospital
Medical Center , Boston, Mass., until 1980 when
she resigned to work full time on the prevention of nuclear war.
In 1971, Dr Caldicott played a major role in Australia's opposition to French
atmospheric nuclear testing in the Pacific; in 1975 she worked with the
Australian trade unions to educate their members about the medical dangers of
the nuclear fuel cycle, with particular reference to uranium mining.
While living in the United States from 1977 to 1986, she co-founded the
Physicians for Social Responsibility , an
organization of 23,000 doctors committed to educating their colleagues about the
dangers of nuclear power, nuclear weapons and nuclear war. On trips abroad she
helped start similar medical organizations in many other countries. The
international umbrella group (International Physicians for the Prevention of
Nuclear War ) won the Nobel Peace Prize
in
1985. She also founded the Women's Action for Nuclear Disarmament
(WAND) in the US in 1980.
Returning to Australia in 1987, Dr Caldicott ran for Federal Parliament
as an independent. Defeating Charles Blunt, leader of
the National Party, through preferential voting she ultimately lost the election
by 600 votes out of 70,000 cast.
She moved back to the United States in 1995, lecturing at the New School for
Social Research on the Media, Global Politics
and the Environment, hosting a weekly radio talk show on WBAI (Pacifica)
, and becoming the Founding President of the STAR
(Standing for Truth About Radiation) Foundation .
Dr Caldicott has received many prizes and awards for her work, including the
Lannan Foundation's 2003 Prize for Cultural Freedom
and 21 honorary doctoral degrees, and she was personally nominated for the Nobel
Peace Prize by Linus Pauling -
himself a Nobel Laureate. The Smithsonian Institute has
named Dr Caldicott as one of the most influential women of the 20th Century. She
has written for numerous publications and has authored seven books
, Nuclear Madness
, Missile Envy, *If You Love This
Planet: A Plan to Heal the Earth* (1992, W.W. Norton )
and *A Desperate Passion: An Autobiography* (1996, W.W. Norton
; published as *A Passionate Life* in Australia by
Random House ), *The New Nuclear Danger: George
Bush’s Military Industrial Complex* (2001, The New Press
in the US, UK and UK; Scribe Publishing
in Australia and New Zealand; Lemniscaat
Publishers in The Netherlands; and Hugendubel Verlag
in Germany), *Nuclear Power is Not the
Answer* (2006, The New Press in the US, UK and UK;
Melbourne University Press in Australia) and
War In Heaven (March 2007). Dr.
Caldicott’s most recent book is the revised and updated If You Love This Planet
(March 2009).
She also has been the subject of several films, including *Eight Minutes to
Midnight*, nominated for an Academy Award in
1981, *If You Love This Planet*, which won the Academy Award
for best documentary in 1982, and *Helen’s
War: portrait of a dissident*, recipient of the Australian Film Institute Awards
for Best Direction (Documentary)
2004, and the Sydney Film Festival
Dendy
Award for Best Documentary in 2004.
Dr Caldicott currently divides her time between Australia and the US where she
lectures widely. She founded the US-based *Nuclear Policy Research Institute*
(NPRI), which evolved into Beyond Nuclear , of
which Dr Caldicott is Founding President. Beyond Nuclear aims to educate and
activate the public about the connections between nuclear power and nuclear
weapons and the need to abandon both to safeguard our future.
Dr Caldicott can be heard discussing urgent planetary survival issues on her
weekly radio show If You Love This Planet
, and is the Founder and Spokesperson
for People for a Nuclear-Free Australia , established to
represent the millions of Australians who uphold the strong belief that there
should be no uranium mining, nuclear power plants or foreign nuclear waste in
Australia.
Dr Caldicott is also a member of the International Scientific Advisory Board
advising José Luis Rodríguez Zapatero, Prime Minister of Spain.
Source: http://www.helencaldicott.com/about.htm
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Helen Caldicott Talks About the Horror of Fukushima
Infowars.com
(http://www.prisonplanet.com/helen-caldicott-talks-about-the-horror-of-fukushima.html)
April 23, 2011
Australian physician, author, and anti-nuclear advocate Helen Caldicott talks
about the Fukushima nuclear catastrophe and what we can expect. It ain’t pretty.
Source:
http://www.prisonplanet.com/helen-caldicott-talks-about-the-horror-of-fukushima.html
home