Comrade Franz Lee
Your words continue being sharp shotsRoy S. Carson, Vheadline.com:
The African 'Star Wars'* - *It is the Pentagon's Africom versus China's web of investments - the ultimate prize: Africa's natural resources.*
By: Pepe Escobar
As Africa increasingly turns to China for economic investment and guidance,
Africom seeks to reverse China's geostrategic foothold on Africa
>From energy wars to water wars, the 21st century will be determined by a
fierce battle for the world's remaining natural resources. The chessboard is
global. The stakes are tremendous. Most battles will be invisible. All will be
crucial.
In resource-rich Africa, a complex subplot of the New Great Game in Eurasia is
already in effect. It's all about three major intertwined developments:
1) The coming of age of the African Union (AU) in the early 2000s.
2) China's investment offencive in Africa throughout the 2000s.
3) The onset of the Pentagon's African Command (Africom) in 2007.
Beijing clearly sees that the Anglo-French-American bombing of Libya – apart
from its myriad geopolitical implications – has risked billions of dollars in
Chinese investments, not to mention forcing the (smooth) evacuation of more than
35,000 Chinese working across the country.
And crucially, depending on the outcome – as in renegotiated energy contracts by
a pliable, pro-Western government – it may also seriously jeopardise Chinese oil
imports (3 per cent of total Chinese imports in 2010).
No wonder the China Military, a People's Liberation Army (PLA) newspaper, as
well as sectors in academia, are now openly arguing that China needs to drop
Deng Xiaoping's "low-profile" policy and bet on a sprawling armed forces to
defend its strategic interests worldwide (these assets already total over $1.2
trillion).
Now compare it with a close examination of Africom's strategy, which reveals as
the proverbial hidden agenda the energy angle and a determined push to isolate
China from northern Africa.
One report titled "China's New Security Strategy in Africa" actually betrays the
Pentagon's fear of the PLA eventually sending troops to Africa to protect
Chinese interests.
It won't happen in Libya. It's not about to happen in Sudan. But further on down
the road, all bets are off.
Meddle is our middle name
The Pentagon has in fact been meddling in Africa's affairs for more than half a
century. According to a 2010 US Congressional Research Service study, this
happened no less than 46 times before the current Libya civil war.
Among other exploits, the Pentagon invested in a botched large-scale invasion of
Somalia and backed the infamous, genocide-related Rwanda regime.
The Bill Clinton administration raised hell in Liberia, Gabon, Congo and Sierra
Leone, bombed Sudan, and sent "advisers" to Ethiopia to back dodgy clients
grabbing a piece of Somalia (by the way, Somalia has been at war for 20 years).
The September 2002 National Security Strategy (NSS), conceived by the Bush
administration, is explicit; Africa is a "strategic priority in fighting terrorism".
Yet, the never-say-die "war on terror" is a sideshow in the Pentagon's vast
militarisation agenda, which favours client regimes, setting up military bases,
and training of mercenaries – "cooperative partnerships" in Pentagon newspeak.
Africom has some sort of military "partnership" – bilateral agreements – with
most of Africa's 53 countries, not to mention fuzzy multilateral schemes such as
West African Standby Force and Africa Partnership Station.
American warships have dropped by virtually every African nation except for
those bordering the Mediterranean.
The exceptions: Ivory Coast, Sudan, Eritrea and Libya. Ivory Coast is now in the
bag. So is South Sudan. Libya may be next. The only ones left to be incorporated
to Africom will be Eritrea and Zimbabwe.
Africom's reputation has not been exactly sterling – as the Tunisian and
Egyptian chapters of the great 2011 Arab Revolt caught it totally by surprise.
These "partners", after all, were essential for surveillance of the southern
Mediterranean and the Red Sea.
Libya for its part presented juicy possibilities: an easily demonised dictator;
a pliable post-Gaddafi puppet regime; a crucial military base for Africom; loads
of excellent cheap oil; and the possibility of throwing China out of Libya.
Under the Obama administration, Africom thus started its first African war. In
the words of its commander, General Carter Ham, "we completed a complex,
short-notice, operational mission in Libya and… transferred that mission to NATO."
And that leads us to the next step. Africom will share all its African "assets"
with NATO. Africom and NATO are in fact one – the Pentagon is a many-headed
hydra after all.
Beijing for its part sees right through it; the Mediterranean as a NATO lake
(neocolonialism is back especially, via France and Britain); Africa militarised
by Africom; and Chinese interests at high risk.
The lure of ChinAfrica
One of the last crucial stages of globalisation - what we may call "ChinAfrica"
– established itself almost in silence and invisibility, at least for Western eyes.
In the past decade, Africa became China's new Far West. The epic tale of masses
of Chinese workers and entrepreneurs discovering big empty virgin spaces, and
wild mixed emotions from exoticism to rejection, racism to outright adventure,
grips anyone's imagination.
Individual Chinese have pierced the collective unconscious of Africa, they have
made Africans dream – while China the great power proved it could conjure
miracles far away from its shores.
For Africa, this "opposites attract" syndrome was a great boost after the 1960s
decolonisation – and the horrid mess that followed it.
China repaved roads and railroads, built dams in Congo, Sudan and Ethiopia,
equipped the whole of Africa with fibre optics, opened hospitals and orphanages,
and – just before Tahrir Square – was about to aid Egypt to relaunch its
civilian nuclear programme.
The white man in Africa has been, most of the time, arrogant and condescending.
The Chinese, humble, courageous, efficient and discreet.
China will soon become Africa's largest trading partner – ahead of France and
the UK – and its top source of foreign investment. It's telling that the best
the West could come up with to counteract this geopolitical earthquake was to go
the militarised way.
The external Chinese model of trade, aid and investment – not to mention the
internal Chinese model of large-scale, state-led investments in infrastructure –
made Africa forget about the West while boosting the strategic importance of
Africa in the global economy.
Why would an African government rely on the ideology-based "adjustments" of IMF
and the World Bank when China attaches no political conditions and respects
sovereignty – for Beijing, the most important principle of international law? On
top of it, China carries no colonial historical baggage in Africa.
Essentially, large swathes of Africa have rejected the West's trademark shock
therapy, and embraced China.
Western elites, predictably, were not amused. Beijing now clearly sees that in
the wider context of the New Great Game in Eurasia, the Pentagon has now
positioned itself to conduct a remixed Cold War with China all across Africa –
using every trick in the book from obscure "partnerships" to engineered chaos.
The leadership in Beijing is silently observing the waters. For the moment, the
Little Helmsman Deng's "crossing the river while feeling the stones" holds.
The Pentagon better wise up. The best Beijing may offer is to help Africa to
fulfil its destiny. In the eyes of Africans themselves, that certainly beats any
Tomahawk.
Pepe Escobar is the roving correspondent for Asia Times (www.atimes.com). His
latest book is Obama Does Globalistan (Nimble Books, 2009). He may be reached at
pepeasia@yahoo.com
The views expressed in this article are the author's own and do not necessarily
reflect Al Jazeera's editorial policy.
http://english.aljazeera.net/indepth/opinion/2011/04/2011422131911465794.html
--
http://english-juttaschmitt.blogspot.com
http://juttaschmitt.blogspot.com
HOME
As radioactive fallout skyrockets, NaturalNews advises readers to consider precautionary doses of iodine, bentonite clay and zeolites
Monday, April 25, 2011
by Mike Adams, the Health Ranger
Editor of NaturalNews.com (See all articles...)
(NaturalNews) Based on the accumulation of information from multiple sources, it
is now clear that the true scope of the Fukushima disaster has been greatly
downplayed by both the Japanese and U.S. governments. NaturalNews is now urging
its readers to begin taking regular, safe doses of three things: Natural iodine
sources (seaweed or otherwise), bentonite clay (for internal use) and zeolites
(any brand).
Naturally, be sure to check with a qualified nutritionist or natural medicine
practitioner when taking supplements. Those on thyroid medications, in
particular, should seek professional advice before consuming supplementary
iodine from any source.
Bentonite clay is, of course, completely safe for internal use (yes, you can eat
it) when used as directed. It is a cleansing substance that can bind with
various radioactive isotopes and carry them out of your body. Zeolites are also
extremely good at attracting both heavy metals and some radioactive isotopes
which are also carried out of your body.
Radiation emissions are far higher than official reports
The reason for this action notice is due to the increasing realization that
radiation emissions from Fukushima are far higher than what we are being told.
Although I have analyzed reports from multiple sources on this, perhaps the best
citizen blogger explaining this right now is found at
http://ex-skf.blogspot.com/2011/04/...
This blogger is Japanese, and he reads the local Japanese news sources to get a
lot of information about Fukushima before the translators screw it up (or
distort it).
His latest post reveals that Fukushima is releasing 154 terabequerels of
radiation per day. This is an order of magnitude higher than what the official
Japanese sources were saying just a few weeks ago.
Another great blogger on Fukushima is Lucas Whitefield Hixson, who published an
analysis of the photos that seems to indicate Reactor No. 3 already suffered a
massive core containment breach from the very first explosion:
http://lucaswhitefieldhixson.com/hi...
If true, this would mean that TEPCO has been lying to us from day one about the
true extend of the reactor core containment vessel breach.
Why world governments won't tell you the truth
I have good reason to believe we may very well be witnessing an event that has
already vastly exceeded the Chernobyl disaster in its total release of radiation
into the environment. Yet the admission of that fact is so politically unviable
that no government dare admit utter the words. Instead, it is much more
politically expedient to simply imagine there is no radiation (it's invisible,
after all), and hope no one notices the huge increases in cancer rates in the
coming years.
Such is the cowardice is modern-day political leaders. To avoid causing a panic,
they would rather people keep eating radioactive fish and drinking radioactive
milk. Somewhere in Washington, a group of nuclear experts must be sitting around
a table with the President, asking, "So when are we going to tell them about all
this?" The answer is, of course, "Never."
After all, any increase in cancer can always be blamed on sunbathing, or tanning
salons, or whatever convenient target the medical community is currently trying
to discredit. (Heck, they could probably find a way to say that vitamin D causes
cancer!)
This Fukushima fallout could even be a whole new profit center for the cancer
industry which has long been in the business of irradiation women's breasts with
mammography machines anyway. Cancer industry corporations must be drooling over
the profit prospects that will emerge from the global radiation exposure under
way right now.
Most people will take no precautions
The upshot of all this is that the masses may be suffering from very risky doses
of radioactive fallout right now, with no precautions whatsoever being taken to
protect themselves. After all, President Obama stood in front of his podium and
told the American people there was nothing to worry about. He said no one needed
to prepare, and this was followed up with yet more official urgings to avoiding
taking potassium iodide. (http://www.naturalnews.com/031735_O...)
The game is apparently on. What game is that? The game of culling the human
population by eliminating from the human gene pool those individuals who are too
brain dead to think for themselves. Cancer + infertility, after all, is a fairly
effective way to remove someone's genetic code from the future of the
population, and what better than a massive, global radiation dump to sort out
the brainwashed masses from those who actually take their genetic future seriously?
That's one theory behind all this, at least. Some say it's only a theory and
nothing more. But when you look at what's really happening today with the mass
intentional contamination and destruction of our planet -- the spread of GMOs,
the fluoride poisoning of the water supply, the pesticide-induced honey bee
population collapse, and so on -- you can't help but wonder if someone really is
trying to kill off a very large segment of the human population. Fukushima
either deliberately or coincidentally seems to play right into that agenda.
Or maybe that's all just paranoid conspiracy thinking, and the real explanation
behind all this is just global government incompetence combined with
pathological national leaders who have no compassion whatsoever for the lives
and health of their own citizens. Either explanation is sufficiently bizarre
enough to make intelligent people at least start asking questions... and
hopefully to start taking some precautions against radiation fallout (hence the
iodine, clay and zeolites). Bentonite clay, after all, doesn't cost much. Losing
the genetic integrity of your sperm production, on the other hand, is a real
show-stopper.
Then again, maybe all of this is just a bunch of hooey. If you believe the
"scientific" community, the government figures are always accurate. There's no
cover-up. The situation is completely under control. The radiation levels are
miniscule. There was no meltdown. Go on about your business and stop worrying.
Just eat your imported fish, go get your CT scans at the hospital and take your
antidepressants. Buy your slave-labor brand-name sports gear at the local mall,
and be sure to slather yourself in perfumes, petroleum-based skin lotions and
sunscreen (to protect yourself from cancer, of course).
And then, a few years down the road, if you find your DNA has mutated beyond
your ability to reproduce in the future, don't worry: You can always trade a
year's salary for some hormone injections at the local infertility clinic,
right? Infertility clinics, by the way, are really great at increasing the
survival rate of fetuses with birth defects which would otherwise normally be
aborted by the mother's own body (http://www.naturalnews.com/020905_i...).
*How Fukushima could create a real Spider Man!
*
So even if the next generation of children in America are born mostly to
irradiated, genetically-mutated parents, thanks to the "miracle" of modern
infertility science we can probably manage to keep a fair number of them alive
long enough for them to become the new generation of post-Fukushima X-Men with
special mutant powers that can save our world from evil villains. Fukushima
might also irradiate some spiders that could bite a few geeky teenage boys and
magically transform them into acrobatic "spider men" who magically attain
advanced hand-to-hand combat skills without ever having practiced them. What
could be bad about that?
In fact, the entire Marvel universe of comic book characters might yet
materialize out of the smoke and (radioactive) dust of Fukushima. So, you see,
Fukushima is actually the solution to all our problems, not the source of any
problems.
And if you think none of this could really happen because I'm quoting characters
from comic books, just remember this: The Japanese government is reading you
lines from a fairy tale and hoping you buy into it just the same.
Learn more: http://www.naturalnews.com/032179_Fukushima_zeolites.html#ixzz1Kb3laRUJ
http://www.naturalnews.com/032179_Fukushima_zeolites.html
--
http://english-juttaschmitt.blogspot.com
http://juttaschmitt.blogspot.com
home
(Video) Australian physician, author, and anti-nuclear advocate Helen Caldicott talks about the Fukushima nuclear catastrophe Comentario: Hola Alba, estimada amiga, gracias por intentar una respuesta en Aporrea. No importa que no te la hayan publicado. Lamentablemente, en algún momento hasta personas tan ciegas y dogmáticas como Brito van a tener que aterrizar en la realidad. Las pocas informaciones no censuradas que nos llegan sobre Japón son verdaderamente horribles. Si manejas un poquito de inglés, vaya a nuestro blog: http://franzjtlee.blogspot.com y lea la última entrada (la que aparece arriba en la página y vea también el video. Ahí habla una veterana activista contra la energía nuclear, Helen Caldicott, y nos da una idea de la espantosa magnitud de lo que pasa en Fukushima y sus nefastas consequencias para la vida en todo el planeta. Un abrazo y saludos cordiales, Franz J. T. Lee y Jutta Schmitt
(Video) Australian physician, author, and anti-nuclear advocate Helen Caldicott talks about the Fukushima nuclear catastrophe and what we can expect. It ain’t pretty.
LINK:
http://www.franzlee.org.ve/pandemonium01573.html
http://www.prisonplanet.com/helen-caldicott-talks-about-the-horror-of-fukushima.html
Helen Caldicott
Biography
The single most articulate and passionate advocate of citizen action to remedy
the nuclear and environmental crises, Dr Helen Caldicott, has devoted the last
38 years to an international campaign to educate the public about the medical
hazards of the nuclear age and the necessary changes in human behavior to stop
environmental destruction.
Born in Melbourne, Australia in 1938, Dr Caldicott received her medical degree
from the University of Adelaide Medical School
in 1961. She founded the Cystic Fibrosis
Clinic at the Adelaide Children's Hospital in 1975
and subsequently was an instructor in pediatrics at Harvard Medical School
and on the staff of the Children's Hospital
Medical Center , Boston, Mass., until 1980 when
she resigned to work full time on the prevention of nuclear war.
In 1971, Dr Caldicott played a major role in Australia's opposition to French
atmospheric nuclear testing in the Pacific; in 1975 she worked with the
Australian trade unions to educate their members about the medical dangers of
the nuclear fuel cycle, with particular reference to uranium mining.
While living in the United States from 1977 to 1986, she co-founded the
Physicians for Social Responsibility , an
organization of 23,000 doctors committed to educating their colleagues about the
dangers of nuclear power, nuclear weapons and nuclear war. On trips abroad she
helped start similar medical organizations in many other countries. The
international umbrella group (International Physicians for the Prevention of
Nuclear War ) won the Nobel Peace Prize
in
1985. She also founded the Women's Action for Nuclear Disarmament
(WAND) in the US in 1980.
Returning to Australia in 1987, Dr Caldicott ran for Federal Parliament
as an independent. Defeating Charles Blunt, leader of
the National Party, through preferential voting she ultimately lost the election
by 600 votes out of 70,000 cast.
She moved back to the United States in 1995, lecturing at the New School for
Social Research on the Media, Global Politics
and the Environment, hosting a weekly radio talk show on WBAI (Pacifica)
, and becoming the Founding President of the STAR
(Standing for Truth About Radiation) Foundation .
Dr Caldicott has received many prizes and awards for her work, including the
Lannan Foundation's 2003 Prize for Cultural Freedom
and 21 honorary doctoral degrees, and she was personally nominated for the Nobel
Peace Prize by Linus Pauling -
himself a Nobel Laureate. The Smithsonian Institute has
named Dr Caldicott as one of the most influential women of the 20th Century. She
has written for numerous publications and has authored seven books
, Nuclear Madness
, Missile Envy, *If You Love This
Planet: A Plan to Heal the Earth* (1992, W.W. Norton )
and *A Desperate Passion: An Autobiography* (1996, W.W. Norton
; published as *A Passionate Life* in Australia by
Random House ), *The New Nuclear Danger: George
Bush’s Military Industrial Complex* (2001, The New Press
in the US, UK and UK; Scribe Publishing
in Australia and New Zealand; Lemniscaat
Publishers in The Netherlands; and Hugendubel Verlag
in Germany), *Nuclear Power is Not the
Answer* (2006, The New Press in the US, UK and UK;
Melbourne University Press in Australia) and
War In Heaven (March 2007). Dr.
Caldicott’s most recent book is the revised and updated If You Love This Planet
(March 2009).
She also has been the subject of several films, including *Eight Minutes to
Midnight*, nominated for an Academy Award in
1981, *If You Love This Planet*, which won the Academy Award
for best documentary in 1982, and *Helen’s
War: portrait of a dissident*, recipient of the Australian Film Institute Awards
for Best Direction (Documentary)
2004, and the Sydney Film Festival
Dendy
Award for Best Documentary in 2004.
Dr Caldicott currently divides her time between Australia and the US where she
lectures widely. She founded the US-based *Nuclear Policy Research Institute*
(NPRI), which evolved into Beyond Nuclear , of
which Dr Caldicott is Founding President. Beyond Nuclear aims to educate and
activate the public about the connections between nuclear power and nuclear
weapons and the need to abandon both to safeguard our future.
Dr Caldicott can be heard discussing urgent planetary survival issues on her
weekly radio show If You Love This Planet
, and is the Founder and Spokesperson
for People for a Nuclear-Free Australia , established to
represent the millions of Australians who uphold the strong belief that there
should be no uranium mining, nuclear power plants or foreign nuclear waste in
Australia.
Dr Caldicott is also a member of the International Scientific Advisory Board
advising José Luis Rodríguez Zapatero, Prime Minister of Spain.
Source: http://www.helencaldicott.com/about.htm
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Helen Caldicott Talks About the Horror of Fukushima
Infowars.com
(http://www.prisonplanet.com/helen-caldicott-talks-about-the-horror-of-fukushima.html)
April 23, 2011
Australian physician, author, and anti-nuclear advocate Helen Caldicott talks
about the Fukushima nuclear catastrophe and what we can expect. It ain’t pretty.
Source:
http://www.prisonplanet.com/helen-caldicott-talks-about-the-horror-of-fukushima.html
home
Franz J. T. Lee: Important Information about the Fukushima Atomic Disaster
Fukushima Meltdown Confirmed by Stephen Lendman
*On April 6, Reuters reported that "the core at Japan's Fukushima nuclear
reactor has melted through the reactor pressure vessel," Rep. Edward Markey told
a House hearing on the disaster, saying:*
*"I have been informed by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) that the core
has gotten so hot that part of it has probably melted through the reactor
pressure vessel."*
*
*
Recklessly promoting nuclear proliferation, America's NRC is notorious for
coverup and denial of its harmful effects. As a result, their rare admission
virtually confirms a full core meltdown in one or more reactors, meaning vast
amounts of radiation are being uncontrollably released into the atmosphere,
water and soil, spreading over a vast area. It's the ultimate nightmare scenario
now unfolding, but don't expect major media reports or government officials to
explain.
Nonetheless, on April 6, New York Times writers Matthew Wald and Andrew Pollack
headlined, "Core of Stricken Reactor Probably Leaked, US Says," stating:
America's NRC "said Wednesday that some of the core of a stricken Japanese
reactor had probably leaked from its steel pressure vessel into the bottom of
the containment structure, implying that the damage was even worse than
previously thought."
Far worse, in fact, because molten core material then burns uncontrollably
through the concrete foundation, meaning all bets are off.
On April 5, Times writers James Glanz and William Broad headlined, "US Sees
Array of New Threats at Japan's Nuclear Plant," saying:
/American engineers warned "that the troubled nuclear plant....is facing a wide
array of fresh threats that could persist indefinitely, and that in some cases
are expected to increase as a result of the very measures being taken to keep
the plant stable, according to a confidential" NRC assessment./
Identified threats include:
-- Possible further explosions because of hydrogen and oxygen from seawater used
to cool the reactors that may have done more harm than good. According to former
GE reactor designer Margaret Harding:
/"If I were in the Japanese's shoes, I'd be very reluctant to have tons and tons
of water sitting in a containment whose structural integrity hasn't been checked
since the earthquake/," and very likely is seriously damaged.
-- Because of concern about severe reactor core damage, NRC recommended boron be
added to cooling water as a moderator to absorb neutrons.
-- Exposed/unprotected spent fuel rods in Units 1, 2, 3 and 4 pose extreme
dangers. Moreover, explosions blew nuclear material "up to one mile from the
units" into the atmosphere, indicating much greater damage than previously
disclosed.
As a result, David Lochbaum from the Union of Concerned Scientists (UCS) believes:
/"This paints a very different picture, and suggests that things are a lot
worse. They could still have more damage in a big way if some of these things
don't work out for them....They've got a lot of nasty things to (handle), and
one missed step could make the situation much, much worse."/
Other experts believe criticality was reached, posing far greater dangers than
revealed.
Yet government and Tokyo Electric (TEPCO) officials still claim "no immediate
risk of a hydrogen explosion occurring" or serious harm to human health. In
fact, danger levels now are extreme. More on that below.
Even the NRC admitted that salt water "severely restricted" and likely blocked
circulation pathways. Moreover, inside the core, "there is likely no water level
(so it's) difficult to determine how much cooling is getting to the fuel."
Perhaps none, and three or more reactors are affected, one or more in meltdown.
*Independent Expert Opinions*
On April 4, geoscientist/international radiation expert Leuren Moret told
interviewer Alfred Lambremont Webre that Obama and Canadian Prime Minister
Stephen Harper are concealing the effects of tectonic nuclear war on North
America from Fukushima's fallout. In fact, Norwegian Institute for Air Research
(NILU) radiation maps confirm contamination on America's West Coast, Midwest,
and Western Canada, in some areas as high as Japan's.
Radioactive Iodine-131 in rainwater sampled near San Francisco was found to be
over 18,000 times above federal drinking water standards. Idaho, Minnesota,
Ohio, Pennsylvania and Massachusetts rainwater samples showed Iodine-131 up to
181 times above normal, expected to rise. It's also showing up in milk.
As a result, mobile measures in parts of America and Canada were suspended until
further notice to conceal the disaster's gravity.
Moret cited two distinguished nuclear scientists who've publicly said northern
Japan (one-third of the country) is uninhabitable and should be evacuated.
Marion Fulk is one, a Manhattan Project scientist who helped develop the
hydrogen bomb. He also was America's atmospheric fallout expert when
above-ground tests were conducted.
Dr. Chris Busby is the other, an ionizing radiation expert. On March 30, he told
Russia Today television that Fukushima contamination will cause at least 417,000
new cancers.
Moret called Fukushima a false flag operation to weaken an economic rival, harm
its economy, agriculture and fisheries, and compromise its detente with China.
Compared to Chernobyl, Fukushima's releasing multiple times more radiation,
perhaps amounts too enormous to imagine with potentially catastrophic global
effects.
In response, Japan, America and Canada are in denial. Permissible radiation
exposure levels have been raised. Legitimate reporting was halted. US and
Canadian atmospheric testing was suspended. State authorities told California
physicians not to give iodine to concerned patients. Measuring radiation in milk
was also stopped.
Contamination is spreading from the Arctic to the Equator. Long-lived
radioactive isotopes will cause environmental and human health havoc for
generations. Moret said life forms developed over billions of years are being
destroyed in a century.
On March 29, Chris Busby's Rense.com article headlined, "Deconstructing Nuclear
Experts," saying:
/"What these people have in common is ignorance. (Most) who appear (in the major
media) and pontificate have not actually done any research on the issue of
radiation and health. Or if they have, they....missed all the key studies and
references. (Others are) real baddies"/ who say Fukushima is nothing to worry
about, nothing like Chernobyl or Three Mile Island (TMI).
In fact, Fukushima already way exceeds both and will get increasingly worse
ahead as radiation releases continue and spread. Busby quoted Joseph Conrad
saying, "after all the shouting is over, the grim silence of facts remain."
/"I believe that (the array of) phony experts,"/ said Busby, "/are criminally
irresponsible, since their advice will lead to millions of deaths....I hope they
are sent to jail where they can have plenty of time to read the scientific
proofs (showing) their advice was based on the mathematical analysis of thin air./"
He cited the late *Professor John Gofman, a senior US Atomic Energy Commission
expert who resigned, saying:*
*/"The nuclear industry is waging a war against humanity."/*
*/
/*
So far, in fact, it's winning. It's entered an endgame that will decide whether
or not humanity will survive. "Not from sudden nuclear war," said Busby. "But
from the ongoing and incremental nuclear war which began with the releases to
the biosphere in the 60s of all the atmospheric test fallout, and which
continued inexorably since (to this day), accompanied by parallel increases in
cancer rates and fertility loss to the human race."
Busby calls it "*/the greatest public health scandal in human history..../*" Who
can disagree.
*A Final Comment*
*
*
In a personal email, environmental researcher Dr. Ilya Perlingieri explained the
dangers of Japan dumping thousands of tons of radioactive water in the Pacific,
saying:
/"We are all in grave danger! This was insanity! This radioactive water will
come here (to America). There is no question about that. The currents will bring
it to the west coast and contaminate the entire area: beaches and all sealife
between the coast and Japan. What evaporates naturally will then come on the air
currents around the rest of the US and then the rest of the planet!"/
/"This is epic, and it was not an accident."/
/
/
/Stephen Lendman lives in Chicago and can be reached at
lendmanstephen@sbcglobal.net .
mailto:lendmanstephen@sbcglobal.net
Also visit
his blog site at sjlendman.blogspot.com and listen to cutting-edge discussions
with distinguished guests on the Progressive Radio News Hour on the Progressive
Radio Network Thursdays at 10AM US Central time and Saturdays and Sundays at
noon. All programs are archived for easy listening./
http://www.internationalnews.fr/article-fukushima-meltdown-confirmed-by-stephen-lendman-71269659.html
*****
Fukushima nuclear war and the Energy Solution Revolution (video)
* By Deborah Dupre , Human
Rights Examiner
* April 9th, 2011 10:39 am ET
If Chernobyl's nuclear disaster was considered a battle, Fukushima would
seemingly be a nuclear war according to reports being leaked in the internet.
Lies and cover-up of Fukushima's uncontrollable meltdown are not being accepted
as well as industry and government planned in the new war involving nuclear
energy but better independent analysis is needed to understand the latest
nuclear catastrophe, especially related to how it is impacting the United States.
The Fukushima psychological operations are failing partially due to Dr. Helen
Calidicott statements of late, edutainment such as the revived film, *THE BATTLE
OF CHERNOBYL *available on the internet, and a host of anti-nuclear human rights
defenders empowering others to reject nuclear energy, the most dangerous of all
non-renewable energy resources, and instead, take a stand in the Energy Solution
Revolution.
As well-funded nuclear energy propaganda, secrets and cover-ups of the nuclear
energy industry are in full swing in attempt to minimize the expanding Fukushima
nightmare, President Obama is being pressured to end the nuclear industry
subsidies and to ensure
an investigation of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is conducted.
Mainstream news is, however, continuing to lead the public against its best
interest by failing to advise of the looming radiation public health crisis
stemming from Fukushima.
Perhaps more efficiently than any other,* Professor Jeffery Grupp
*
has analyzed the mass confusion related to the recent reports about radiation
fallout in the United States, including information echoed by astute reporters
such as Stephen Lendman, one among many trying to responsibly piece together the
truth about Fukushima. (See: /Fukishima breakdown: Something fishy about the
reporting, / Brasscheck TV)
Lendmen wrote this week
about the NRC, the Fukushima meltdown, and mainstream news blackout on the
latest global nuclear catastrophe spreading from Japan:
"Recklessly promoting nuclear proliferation, America's NRC is notorious for
coverup and denial of its harmful effects. As a result, their rare admission
virtually confirms a full core meltdown in one or more reactors, meaning
vast amounts of radiation are being uncontrollably released into the
atmosphere, water and soil, spreading over a vast area. It's the ultimate
nightmare scenario now unfolding, but don't expect major media reports or
government officials to explain." (See: /Fukushima Meltdown Confirmed/
,
Stephen Lendman, International News, April 8, 2011)
It appears that the only bonafide Fukushima explanations are from the likes of
Lendman, Greg Palast and, of course, the leader in the field, Dr. Helen
Caldicott who is conveying that Fukushima is more devastating than Chernobyl.
“Only one reactor blew at Chernobyl and it was only 3 months old, with new cores
holding relatively little radiation; these ones have been operating for 40 years
and would hold about 30 times more radiation than Chernobyl’s,” Dr. Caldicott
recently explained in an interview with /The Independent,/ Australia
/ >.
Dr. Caldicott cited the New York Academy of Sciences report that stated over 1
million people died as a direct result of the 1986 Chernobyl melt-down, mostly
from cancer. This is contrary to reports by nuclear energy proponents that lead
the public to believe "stress" caused more Chernobyl deaths than its leaked
radiation.
"She said authorities had attempted to 'hush up' the full scale of the Chernobyl
disaster," according to the /Independent/ that cited the official 2005 figure
from the International Atomic Energy Agency being just 4,000 fatalities.
*Fukushima War*
The Fukushima Nuclear War is better understood by viewing THE BATTLE OF
CHERNOBYL film that is embedded on this page at the left of this article. This
documentary dramatically chronicles the harrowing efforts that started on the
26th of April 1986 to stop the northern Ukraine nuclear power station chain
reaction and prevent a second explosion, to "liquidate" the radioactivity, and
to seal the ruined reactor under a mammoth "sarcophagus."
The BATTLE OF CHERNOBYL film provides the viewer visuals of some of the
operation segments being attempted at Japan's Fukushima reactors that are
destined to measure far worse than Chernobyl according to Dr. Helen Caldicott
/ >,
the most influential environmental activist over the past 35 years. This film
that analyzes the Chernobyl nuclear power station in northern Ukraine explosion
is receiving renewed interest since Japan's nuclear power catastrophe that is
said by some researchers to dwarf Chernobyl.
Dr. Helen Cladicott has called the Fukushima nuclear power plant situation in
Japan an “absolute disaster” that could be* many, many times worse than Chernobyl.*
In 1986, the Chernobyl nuclear plant was the most significant reactor failure in
the history of nuclear power, a Maximum Credible Accident (MCA). The plant, only
20 km away from the town center, was made of four reactor units each generating
an output of 1,000 megawatts. One of the reactors exploded due to operational
errors and inadequate safety measures. The meltdown was directly linked to
routine testing on the reactor unit’s turbine generators.
In the documentary, the nerve-racking events are recounted through newly
available films, videos and photos taken in and around the plant, computer
animation, and interviews with participants and eyewitnesses, many of whom were
exposed to radiation, including government and military leaders, scientists,
workers, journalists, doctors, and Pripyat refugees.
According to the THE BATTLE OF CHERNOBYL documentary filmmakers:
More than 200 people died or were seriously injured by radiation exposure
immediately after the explosion. 161,000 people had to be evacuated from a
30 kilometer radius of the reactor and 25,000 square km of land were
contaminated. As time went on millions of people suffered radiation related
health problems such as leukemia and thyroid cancer and around 4,000 people
have died as a result of the long-term effects of the accident.
Nobody was prepared for such a crisis. For the next seven months, 500,000
men will wage hand-to-hand combat with an invisible enemy – a ruthless
battle that has gone unsung, which claimed thousands of unnamed and now
almost forgotten heroes. Yet, it is thanks to these men that the worst was
avoided; a second explosion, ten times more powerful than Hiroshima which
would have wiped out more than half of Europe.
This was kept secret for twenty years by the Soviets and the West alike.
Advertisement
*Fukushima syndrome to begin*
Consequences of the Chernobyl catastrophe continue today. Thousands of disabled
survivors suffering from the "Chernobyl syndrome" of radiation-related
illnesses, and the urgent need to replace the hastily-constructed and now
crumbling sarcophagus over the still-contaminated reactor.
Despite soothing words from nuclear energy industry promoters in the ongoing
Fukushima nuclear catastrophe, "each update has signalled fresh disaster and
even more drastic warnings" writes David Donovan.
Over the past week, Radioactive Iodine-131 in rainwater sampled near San
Francisco was over 18,000 times above federal drinking water standards; Idaho,
Minnesota, Ohio, Pennsylvania and Massachusetts rainwater samples showed
Iodine-131 up to 181 times above normal; and Iodine-131 has also been found in
milk in the U.S.
Asked whether the Fukushima Japan disaster could be, say, 30 times worse than
Chernobyl, Dr Caldicott said it could be even most catastrophic than that.
Lendman wrote that in a personal email, environmental researcher Dr. Ilya
Perlingieri explained the dangers of Japan dumping thousands of tons of
radioactive water into the Pacific Ocean:
"We are all in grave danger! This was insanity! This radioactive water will
come here (to America). There is no question about that. The currents will
bring it to the west coast and contaminate the entire area: beaches and all
sealife between the coast and Japan. What evaporates naturally will then
come on the air currents around the rest of the US and then the rest of the
planet!"
*Solutions*
Sustaining nuclear energy is a human rights violation. The entire nuclear fuel
chain involves releasing radioactivity, contaminating the environment, and
damaging human health.
"Most often, communities of color, indigenous peoples or those of low-income are
targeted to bear the brunt of these impacts, particularly the damaging health
and environmental effects of uranium mining," states Beyond Nuclear.
The nuclear power industry inevitably violates human rights and the solutions
involve halting these violations.
While anti-nuclear campaigner Dr Helen Caldicott says Fukushima could spell the
end of the nuclear industry worldwide, further public action is required to
counter the stranglehold of nuclear lobbyists and the industry insiders who
financially benefit from it.
Dr. Caldicott recently stated that the human rights violation involved in a
nuclear disaster has been been needed to stop the nuclear madness.
“I have said before, unfortunately, the only thing that is capable of stopping
this wicked industry is a major catastrophe, and it now looks like this may be it.”
Rather than spending trillions of dollars on unproved wars and bailing out banks
that made unwise gambles, money could be spent on clean renewable energy that
would solve the energy problem, create jobs, increase tax revenue, and end the
need for wars for oil. These were all been presented in the multi-award-winning
movie, /*FUEL - */as were renewable energy projects
implemented now and available in local communities.
Another recent study has claimed that 100 percent of renewable energy is
possible by 2030.
PhysOrg.com
reports that
the new research shows it is possible and affordable for the world to achieve
100 percent renewable energy by 2030 - if there is the political will to strive
for this goal.
Achieving 100 percent renewable energy would mean building approximately four
million 5 MW wind turbines, 1.7 billion 3 kW roof-mounted solar photovoltaic
systems, and 90,000 300 MW solar power plants.
The public is urged to petition to "End Nuclear Industry Subsidies." Only days
before the Japanese earthquake, nuclear power company Duke Energy extended a $10
million loan to Obama’s re-election convention committee. Duke Energy operates
three nuclear plants and is negotiating with federal officials on subsidies to
build a fourth.
President Obama needs to reject the $10 million loan from Duke Energy according
to renewable energy and human rights defenders. They are urging the public to
sign the petition for Obama to call for an immediate review of the safety
measures at each of the more than 100 nuclear reactors in the United States at:
http://tinyurl.com/69qecbu.
"The nuclear emergency in Japan is an unfortunate reminder that nuclear
power is inherently dangerous. Instead of sinking billions of dollars more
into this fatally flawed technology, we must deploy safe and clean energy
alternatives."
While NRC continues looking the other way on reactor safety concerns and
routinely renews licenses for aging reactors, the White House is pushing for
even more money for toxic loan guarantees for new reactors.
Beyond Nuclear reports this week:
"The latest news is that the Obama administration wants to triple the
already $18.5 billion appropriated for new reactors. That's a cool $54.5
billion, a tab that will end up being paid by us, American taxpayers. We
can't let this happen. Please help prevent this needless and obscene giveaway."
Act now to stop President Obama from using American taxpayer money to foster
nuclear energy. / > (See:
www.beyondnuclear.org/actnow/ )
Call the White House (202-456-1111) and Congress (202-224-3121) and ask them to:
1. Stop toxic loan guarantees for new reactors and other nuclear projects!
2. Phase out existing reactors!
*****
*The cesium deception: Why the mainstream media is mostly reporting iodine
levels, not radioactive cesium*
Thursday, April 07, 2011
by Mike Adams
(NaturalNews) Virtually all the numbers you're seeing about the radioactivity
coming out of Fukushima are based on iodine-131 which only has a half-life of 8
days, not the far more dangerous cesium-137 which has a half-life of 30 years.
So while the mainstream media reports that "radiation levels are falling
rapidly" from the 7.5 million times reading taken a few days ago, what they're
not telling you is that the cesium-137 radioactivity will take 30 years just to
fall by 50 percent.
It's the great global cover-up in all this: What happens to all the radioactive
cesium being dumped into the ocean right now? It doesn't just burn itself out in
a few months like iodine-131. This stuff sticks around for centuries.
As part of the cover story, the FDA now says it will test "all imported food
products coming from Japan" (http://ecocentric.blogs.time.com/20...). This claim
is, of course, ridiculous on its face. Even without this Fukushima emergency in
the works, the FDA only tests a tiny fraction of all the food imported into the
USA. This agency has no existing infrastructure under which it could test ALL
the food being imported from Japan. The very idea is ludicrous.
As this ABC News story reveals, the FDA says it's "really stretched" just to
inspect a mere two percent of imported food: http://abcnews.go.com/Health/radiat...
*The FDA likes radiation!*
Even if the FDA could magically test all the food being imported from Japan,
what allowable level of radiation would the FDA claim was "safe" in those foods
anyway? Remember, this is the agency that has long supported the mass
irradiation of the U.S. food supply as a way to kill e.coli and salmonella.
For all we know, FDA bureaucrats equate radiation with safety and might actually
declare radioactive seafood from Japan to be safer than non-radioactive food
because, they would say, the radiation "kills salmonella."
Why eating radioactive food is FAR more dangerous than nuclear fallout
The other element in all this that's hardly being reported in the press is that
when you eat radioactive food, the threat to your health increases
exponentially. That's because internal radiation is far more deadly to your body
than external radiation. It all comes down to the law of the inverse square of
the distance between you and the radiation source.
A speck of radioactive dust that's one meter away from you, for example, is
twice as dangerous as that same speck four meters away. But if you eat that
radioactive speck (because it's part of a fish you're consuming, for example),
then suddenly it's inside your body. So now it might only be a millimeter away
from your internal tissues, meaning you've decreased the distance between you
and the radiation source by one thousand times. Because if the law of the
inverse square of the distance, you have now magnified the radiation intensity
by one million times (because one million is the square of one thousand).
So a speck of radiation that might have been a "low level" if it were floating
around in the air around you can suddenly become fatal if you consume it. And
that's what people are now facing with Japan's seafood. Yet everybody is being
told that it's all perfectly safe, no problem, no worried, don't even think
about it.
Where does the radiation go in your body?
We're all being lied to about the "safety" of radioactive food, you see. And
there's more to it than what has been discussed here, actually: If a fish takes
in radioactive cesium and it gets distributed throughout the body of that fish
in the way that potassium would normally get distributed (because cesium follows
nearly the same biological pathways as potassium), then the radioactive cesium
has become part of the fish flesh.
When you eat that fish, your body breaks down the fish tissues, then reabsorbs
the cesium into your own body, distributing the cesium into your own muscle
tissues where potassium would normally go. You are what you eat, after all. And
if you eat radioactive cesium, then you quickly become a walking radioactive
dirty bomb from the inside.
If it's invisible, it must be safe
They don't tell you that on CNN, folks. I'm willing to bet their "info babe"
news models don't even have a clue about the laws of physics in the first place.
So while they're all telling you that eating irradiated seafood from Japan is
perfectly safe, the truth is that it could very well be quite deadly if you're
eating fish that contain high levels of cesium.
So you might wonder, then, are fish being detected with cesium in their tissues?
You bet they are! You'll find the details in these news stories:
http://www.radioaustralia.net.au/co... and http://mdn.mainichi.jp/mdnnews/busi...
The extremely high levels of radiation even have the local fishermen freaked
out. "I can't go out to fish because of the radiation," one Japanese fisherman
told ABC News (http://abcnews.go.com/Health/radiat...).
But don't worry, we're told. It's all safe to eat. The FDA is in charge, after all.
And remember what governments always say about radiation and chemicals: If it's
invisible, it MUST be safe!
****
Learn more: http://www.naturalnews.com/031992_radioactive_cesium.html#ixzz1IzOLKuCs
http://www.naturalnews.com/031992_radioactive_cesium.html
--
http://english-juttaschmitt.blogspot.com
http://juttaschmitt.blogspot.com
SOURCE:
http://www.examiner.com/human-rights-in-national/fukushima-nuclear-war-and-the-energy-solution-revolution-video?CID=examiner_alerts_article
--
http://english-juttaschmitt.blogspot.com
http://juttaschmitt.blogspot.com
SOURCE:
http://www.internationalnews.fr/article-fukushima-meltdown-confirmed-by-stephen-lendman-71269659.html
--
http://english-juttaschmitt.blogspot.com
http://juttaschmitt.blogspot.com
http://umweltinstitut.org/pressemitteilungen/2011/2011_03_29-863.html
--
http://english-juttaschmitt.blogspot.com
http://juttaschmitt.blogspot.com
HOME